EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA


January 15, 2013

Letter: Arms and freedom go hand in hand

To the editor:

Years ago, the military leader of a successful insurgency stated the following:

“A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies.”

Lately, following the recent events we have all witnessed, I have given these words great thought. A free people ought not only be armed, but disciplined. These words advise arming, not disarming, but that the free people must be disciplined. There is little doubt as to arming a free people, but what is meant for the free people to be disciplined. I interpret this to be a disciplined, armed, free people. For the people to maintain their freedom, it requires the discipline to retain their arms, and their rights for such arms. The statement goes on “to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite.” A free people are to understand why the need to be armed exists, and to establish policy to protect this belief. Merely being armed does not protect the people, but understanding the need to be armed is even of greater importance. Believing in the need to be armed ensures the people have that understanding to know that a free people can continue.

“And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others ...” The free people’s safety and interest depends on the ability to be independent of others. When one is dependent upon others for their food, housing, and the welfare of others, that person unknowingly sacrifices their freedom. Their independence is traded away in lieu of dependency. Once the ability to provide for one’s own safety and interest is lost, a free people no longer exist. I believe these words apply more today, than ever before. When a government trades the people’s rights for basic needs, is that society the utopia one seeks. Is it a government’s role to tax a people and use the people’s revenues to buy the individual rights from the people?

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Latest News

NDN Video
FIFA Rejects Suarez Appeal Against Biting Ban World Cup Final Pits Argentina Against Germany Obama Responds to Hecklers on Immigration Chimp-attack Victim Lobbies Congress Police: Prostitute Linked to 2nd Death Thousands Attend NYC Firefighter's Funeral Neighbors Mourn Killing of Texas Family Art of Haitian Machete Fighting Revived Israeli-Palestinian Tensions, Attacks Escalate UN Secretary-General Urges Mideast Ceasefire 'Game of Thrones' Leads Emmy Nominees Raw: Australia Hosts Annual Beer Can Regatta At Texas Border, a Daily Tide of Poor Migrants Raw: Rescuers Push Beached Whale Back to Ocean Mass. Mayor: Families Lost Everything in Fire Four Kids, Two Adults Shot Dead Near Houston Connecticut Boy Dies Inside Parked Car Fans Dying to Be Near Jazz Greats Robots Gearing Up for Their Own 'World Cup'
Photos of the Week