EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA


October 24, 2012

Letter: Adams is best choice for state Senate

To the editor:

Paul Adams is a tirelessly hard worker. Including the primary he’s knocked on over 25,000 doors. He prefers doing, fighting for the best interests of his constituents, taking his elected official responsibilities and representing his district to heart.

I support Paul for a number of reasons. Most importantly, this election is about private sector jobs and Massachusetts living within its means, while concurrently reining in Gov. Deval Patrick’s feckless spending, including on those here illegally, siphoning off much needed local aid money otherwise coming back to the district.

Our state unemployment is roughly 6.3 percent, but our economy could be doing much better when factoring in roughly 15 percent of people underemployed. Paul Adams has dedicated his efforts working towards creating an economic environment fighting for reducing taxes, government regulations, and mandates providing profit incentive for businesses to expand operations and encouraging them to create private sector jobs.

It’s a tough fight. We need more representatives in the Massachusetts Legislature like Paul Adams to help make Massachusetts a state people want to move to instead of moving out of for better opportunities elsewhere, which causes Massachusetts to lose both tax revenue and congressional seats.

Paul has fought to reduce the sales tax, eliminate the meals tax, and certainly won’t be looking to institute any alcohol taxes. Paul Adams championed a regulation reform bill requiring the state to produce price tags on regulations before instituting them. This prevents the state from simply slapping new regulations on businesses and consumers adding on to them unlimited costs.

Looking closely at Barry Finegold’s record he: instituted the alcohol tax; increased the sales tax by 25 percent to 6.25 percent; and instituted the meals tax adding a 0.75 tax to your bill. Adding both the sales and meals tax increase your tax for dining out dining out rose 40 percent, from 5 percent to 7 percent. Finegold also fought against reducing the personal income tax; cut local aid by $450 million dollars; increased corporate taxes on large employers with assets in other states, creating disincentives for them to locate in Massachusetts or hire here.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Latest News

NDN Video
Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue
Photos of the Week