EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA

New Hampshire

September 2, 2010

Pelham board weighs allowing dissent versus a unified face

PELHAM — The School Board's vice chairman said the panel's success or failure in improving education rests on its presentation of a unified front on proposals that go to the public for a vote.

At last night's meeting, Vice Chairwoman Deb Ryan said she wanted to know what the board could do to police violations of any board policy prohibiting members from attacking positions staked out by a majority of the board.

The board's lawyer, Dean Eggert, said free speech rights guaranteed by the Constitution protect dissent and the board is limited in the action it can take against members who oppose majority positions.

"The First Amendment will always trump ethics," Eggert said.

He said the board can set ethical standards on what is proper, in terms of publicly opposing a majority board position, but the board is limited to doing no more than censuring the individual.

To do more, such as removing a member from the board, would be a violation of law, not of ethics policy, he said.

Specifically, Ryan referred to two instances involving board member Linda Mahoney last year. In one case, Mahoney spoke out in a newspaper story against the new high school proposal on the Town Meeting ballot.

In the other instance, Mahoney spoke at a court hearing, opposing the district's petition to seek a Special Town Meeting on the new high school.

A majority of the board supported both endeavors, but both failed.

The public narrowly defeated the high school, failing to give it the necessary 60 percent majority.

A Hillsborough Superior Court judge denied the district's petition for the special meeting.

"It's better to present a unified front," Ryan said.

She said many people in town do not know the ins and outs of the board's debate over issues, they just hear that the board is divided so they are less likely to vote in favor of the proposal.

Ryan also wanted to know if the board could hash out differences off camera.

Eggert told Ryan that state law requires the decision making to take place in public.

In New Hampshire, the law heavily favors openness, Eggert said.

• • •

Join the discussion. To comment on stories and see what others are saying, log on to eagletribune.com.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
New Hampshire

Town Meeting 2012
  • N.H. polling times, places

    Southern New Hampshire voters will go to the polls Tuesday, March 13, to elect town and school officials, weigh in on budgets and a variety of other questions.

    Continued ...
    1 day
  • Salem voters asked to OK curbside trash pickup

    Salem voters will decide next month whether to start curbisde trash pickup. residents and officials are divided, but neighboring towns that have it, say it works for them.

    Continued ...
    2 days 2 Photos
  • Windham residents split on athletic field proposal

    WINDHAM — Political payback didn't take long this weekend in Windham.
    Friday night Dennis Senibaldi led two hours of questioning of school officials over a $711,000 request for design fees for a middle school.

    Continued ...
    2 days
  • Dissenter shifts on police article

    HAMPSTEAD - Selectman Sean Murphy told the crowd at last night's deliberative session that he changed his mind about the $1.53 million warrant article to build a new police station.
    Murphy voted not to recommend the plan to build a 7,600-square-foot, one-story facility on Veterans Way in January. But he told more than 50 people at last night's meeting he now feels differently.

    Continued ...
    3 days
  • Londonderry voters to get $64.7M school budget in March

    LONDONDERRY — More than 270 of the town's 14,700 registered voters came out last night to hear details of the school district's proposed $64.7 million budget.
    Final voting on the budget and other warrant articles is set for March 13.

    Continued ...
    3 days

ET Videos