The reasoning behind this varies but usually involves a cabal of Republican operatives and their corporate lap dogs seeking to rig elections in their favor. Or, it's members of the Democratic Party "machine" trying to steal the election from the "outsider" candidate.
Pick your poison, it all centers around the mantra that we must "count every vote."
So that's why we have a partial recount of Democratic ballots underway in New Hampshire even though it is certain that the results will not change an iota.
The whole idea that it will is a fallacy that is destructive to Americans' confidence in the democratic process.
Sen. Hillary Clinton won the New Hampshire primary among Democrats with 39 percent of the vote. In second place was Sen. Barack Obama with 37 percent.
But some vote watchers noted a difference in the ratio of votes for Obama and Clinton where ballots were hand counted compared to where they were tallied by machine. Thus was a conspiracy theory born. The machines are tipping the election to Clinton!
Enter Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, the standard-bearer for the loony left and himself a Democratic candidate for president. Kucinich demanded a recount in New Hampshire, where he received 1 percent of the vote.
Candidates who lose by less than 3 percentage points are entitled in New Hampshire to a recount for a fee of $2,000. Those who lose by more can still ask for a recount. But they must pay the full cost - 24 cents per vote. Kucinich has paid $27,000 for a recount of the vote in Hillsborough and Rockingham counties. If he opts for a full recount it will cost him about $70,000.
Note that Obama, who lost by 2 percentage points, could have had a recount for a $2,000 fee but has not asked for one.
Here's where we agree with Kucinich: The machines did not count every vote. Here is where we differ: It doesn't matter.
It is the nature of machines that they will make mistakes. Humans make mistakes as well. But machines make them at predictable rates.
Clinton tallied 112,251 votes in New Hampshire. Obama received 104,772 votes. That's a difference of 7,479 votes. If the ballot machines failed to count 100, 1,000 or even 5,000 votes, the result is the same.