EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA

Opinion

October 15, 2013

Editorial: Water system woes need an airing

For many months, those who own homes on Plum Island have been left to wonder what is wrong with their water system.

It’s been in the ground for less than a decade, yet the multi-million-dollar system is experiencing a significant problem. Our sister newspaper The Daily News of Newburyport first brought this hushed-up issue to the public’s attention in February, and the public now knows some general information — basically that an unknown number of bolts that hold water pipes together are rusting and falling apart. But the public has been kept in the dark about the precise extent of the problem, who is at fault, who will fix it, and what the cost will be.

These are significant questions that islanders — and Merrimack Valley residents who own property there — have a right to know. It’s time for the state, which has been the key player in the hushing of information, to step forward and deliver a comprehensive explanation.

This issue came to the surface in a very public way recently, when the Newburyport City Council voted by a one-vote margin against councilor and mayoral candidate Richard Sullivan Jr.’s effort to release the council’s executive session meeting minutes pertaining to the water system problem. Under state law, civic bodies are allowed to go into these non-public sessions to discuss certain matters, and they may keep the minutes private for a period of time.

Typically, the council would keep these minutes under wraps if there is pending legal action being taken, which the city has stated is the case in this situation.

Further complicating the matter is the fact that Newburyport is in a full blown mayoral election cycle. There is no doubt that Sullivan’s efforts can be seen as a politically-motivated move to put Mayor Donna Holaday on the defensive. Holaday has recommended against releasing the minutes, saying that the state does not want the city to reveal too much about the situation. The state supposedly does not want to jeopardize any legal case it is building.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

Helium debate
Helium
Political News