There is nothing better for a bad federal budget than a good economy, and the recovering U.S. economy is beginning to work its magic on the federal deficit, which has been in the $1 trillion-plus range the last four years.
The Associated Press says, “For once, the government’s financial shape is actually improving and will get better still over the next few years as the U.S. economy continues to pull itself slowly out of the worst recession since the 1930s.”
That “for once” is a little unfair because from 1993 to 1997 the federal deficit, the excess of spending over revenues, fell by more than $230 billion to around $21 billion — itself the lowest in over 20 years — before going into the black for the first time in nearly 30 years.
That happy state of affairs lasted four years, until 2002, and the first round of the George W. Bush tax cuts. The federal budget numbers look so impressive, so orderly, so definitive in the annual White House budget office but it’s an open secret in Washington that these numbers are just informed guesses often based on improbable assumptions. For example, the number crunchers are required to assume that Congress will actually do what it says it will.
The Bush White House mistakenly believed it was dealing with a 10-year surplus of more than $5 trillion. Then came a second round of tax cuts. The Bush mantra was “we’re going to put some extra money in your pocket,” neglecting to mention that the money would have to be borrowed.
Then we fought a costly and, as it turned out, unnecessary war in Iraq and are still fighting a second one in Afghanistan, neither of them paid for. One wonders what the response would have been if the government had asked the voters: “We feel for the good of the country we have to invade Iraq. How much more in taxes are you willing to pay to have us do that?”