Twelve years ago, we were staring at smoking rubble in downtown Manhattan and the Pentagon, counting the dead, wondering who had committed this atrocity and why, fearful of what they might do next, uncertain how to proceed. How far have we come since then?
On one hand, we have not experienced a second terrorist assault on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001. Osama bin Laden has been eliminated, as have many of his lieutenants. That’s not nothing.
On the other hand, al-Qaida affiliates, commanded by bin Laden’s successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri, are a threatening presence in more than a dozen countries. Al-Qaida’s close ally, the Taliban, is by no means defeated in Afghanistan. AQ has reconstituted in Iraq in the wake of the U.S. withdrawal. Its combatants have been flowing into Syria, where they are prominent among the rebel groups fighting the Assad regime — which is itself the cat’s paw of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Leslie Gelb, the sophisticated and intelligent president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote that Iran “shares America’s concerns about Sunni fanaticism and jihadism.” Does he really not perceive that Iran’s rulers are Shiite fanatics and jihadists? Does he not understand the extent to which Iran’s 1979 “Islamic Revolution” inspired and challenged radical Sunnis to create al-Qaida? Is it not clear to him that both Sunni and Shiite jihadists share the same goal: “a world without America,” as former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad succinctly put it? A Middle East without America would represent a major milestone.
That’s why the Battle of Syria has become so important. That’s why Iran’s rulers are so committed to Bashar Assad, sending him not just money and weapons but also commanders, strategists and troops from their Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well from Hezbollah, their Lebanon-based foreign legion.