EagleTribune.com, North Andover, MA

Opinion

June 7, 2013

Self-driving car may have mind of its own

Self-driving cars are nearer than we think, and here's how we know: The U.S. government has decided that they are badly in need of federal regulation.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has begun a four-year study to plan guidelines for the regulation of cars that drive themselves — or, as the bureaucrats describe them, "autonomous vehicles."

Using a combination of radars, lasers, cameras, computers and GPS systems, these cars can drive to their destinations and park themselves, without the interference of humans.

And there's one of the questions the feds are wrestling with: Should a human even be required aboard the car, and, if so, should he be required to sit in the driver's seat? The feds think so, and go even further, recommending that there be a special driver's license to "operate" — meaning, sit in the front seat in a driverless vehicle.

The test for a license for a person to "operate" an autonomous vehicle should be quick. All you need to know is how to turn it on and off. The traffic regulations and rules of the road would already be programmed into the car's computer.

The professional worriers have come up with the usual melodramatic scenarios that seem to cry out, as the regulators intended, for federal regulation.

As one worrier told the Sacramento Bee, "There's often a difficult balance that we, as a regulator, face. You've approved something, it crashed and killed (a) choir on the way to a tsunami relief concert. Who's responsible for that?"

Oh, I don't know. God? The concert promoter? The choir singing "Ninety-nine bottles of beer on the wall"? On-board electronic devices screwing up the computer like the airlines tell you they will when you're getting ready to take off.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

Helium debate
Helium
Political News