The Obama administration should shelve the idea of suspending all or part of the $1.55 billion in aid requested for Egypt in fiscal 2014.
Increasingly frustrated in its efforts to have Egypt’s military halt its violent crackdown on demonstrators, the White House is considering cutting off $250 million in economic aid — but not the $1.3 billion earmarked for military aid. It seems unfazed by the hypocrisy of this proposed plan.
The economic aid comes to about $3 a head among Egypt’s 83 million people. The money, administered by the U.S. Agency for International Development, goes for such programs as training hospital administrators, teachers and local government officials, The New York Times reports. It is hard to see how pulling the plug on such useful-sounding programs would garner anything but ill will.
The military aid commitment, more than 30 years old, is bound up with Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel. If Egypt abrogates that treaty, as the Muslim Brotherhood wants, the U.S. would have clear justification for ending that aid.
But even if military aid has not given the United States desired leverage with Egypt’s generals, there are reasons for keeping it in place.
Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states want the program to continue, in part as a counterweight to Iran’s attempts to exercise greater sway in the region.
Secondly, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged $8 billion in grants and loans to Egypt’s government now that the Brotherhood-backed president, Mohamed Morsi, has been ousted.
Most of the military aid is spent in the United States on U.S. weapons systems — aircraft, armored vehicles, communications equipment, upgrades.
Finally, the Russians and Chinese would be delighted to take our place as Egypt’s chief weapons supplier.
In a perfect world, cutting off aid would not only be the sensible but the moral choice. Unfortunately, it’s not a perfect world, nor is it particularly moral or sensible.
Dale McFeatters writes for the Scripps Howard News Service.